Logo I
  • home
  • design
    • furniture
    • building
    • books
    • banana dryer
  • the ROCAT
    • introduction
    • proto-1
    • proto-2
    • proto-3
    • proto-4
    • post 4
    • the future
    • videos
    • archive
  • photography
    • places
    • events
    • people/street
    • coast and sea
    • panoramas
    • short stories
    • client
    • client login
    • lightbox
    • cart
  • about
  • contact

The SMART Micro Project Award gave me a year and £10K to build and test a working prototype of a rowing catamaran.

The project was scary: full of unknowns, with a great deal to learn very quickly. But it was also very exciting – it was my first opportunity to realise a new product idea from scratch.

Although I was able to match the SMART award funds with a legacy, it was evident that money would be extremely tight.

The objectives for the new craft were very clear from the start – it had to be

  1. fast and easily driven
  2. absolutely stable in open water
  3. and very easy to transport on a regular family car.

Achieving those objectives would represent an unparalleled combination of features in one boat, but there was more. Competitive rowing in my teens had damaged my back and I wanted to devise a rowing mechanism which was less likely to result in back injury.

The sliding seat rowing stroke is an abomination – if you tried to lift weights in a gym the way you are supposed to haul on an oar, your trainer would have a fit. Apart from that, thrashing a heavy body back and forth in an ultralight boat is absurd – you will have seen how racing boats stop and start as momentum and thrust fight it out. In fact, the marginally better sliding rigger was invented at about the same time as the sliding seat at the end of the nineteenth century but, as often seems the case, the inferior system prevailed.

The ROCAT rigger has a fixed seat and the rower’s back is properly supported. The rower’s legs provide most of the power, as they should, and the arms finish the stroke. But this device was all new and I had no idea if it would work, or how best to achieve it.

Also, what would the optimum length-to-beam ratio be for the slim, very low-drag hulls? While the stability and hydrodynamics of the boat would benefit from a wide beam, the structure would prefer it to be narrow. In the end, eye and intuition determined the proportions and they work well.

A boat CAD program helped me to design the hulls, and a length of 4.5m was chosen on the grounds of transportability. I cut the ‘stations’ (cross sections) out of ply and took them to ACMC (Advanced Composites Manufacturing Centre) in Plymouth who used them very expertly to shape up a plug (master shape). From this they took two half-moulds and moulded two hulls.

Penzance boating pond, which I had used to compare various scale-model hull forms, was perfect for testing the buoyancy water-line and centre of buoyancy of the new hulls.

The pictures below show the evolution of the seatdeck and rigger.

ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - anticipating numerous revisions the first seatdeck used a scrap  plastic chair in a crude pl...
ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - anticipating numerous revisions the first seatdeck used a scrap plastic chair in a crude plywood box.
ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - to begin with the footbar runners were on the sides of the seatdeck,  but these were not str...
ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - to begin with the footbar runners were on the sides of the seatdeck, but these were not strong enough to take the horizontal rotational loads on the footbar
The ROCAT's 1st footbar with adjustment built-in
The ROCAT's 1st footbar with adjustment built-in
ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - the runner moves to the centreline using a sailing sheet track,  but it doesn't work because...
ROCAT proto-1's first seatdeck - the runner moves to the centreline using a sailing sheet track, but it doesn't work because the loads are in the wrong direction
The 3rd footbar on proto-1 using aluminium tube and central runner - rollerblade wheels bearing on the central wooden track w...
The 3rd footbar on proto-1 using aluminium tube and central runner - rollerblade wheels bearing on the central wooden track worked very well
Moulds for proto-1's crossbeams
Moulds for proto-1's crossbeams
Vacuum-bagging a proto-1 crossbeam
Vacuum-bagging a proto-1 crossbeam
Establishing the waterline and centre of buoyancy of a proto-1 hull
Establishing the waterline and centre of buoyancy of a proto-1 hull
The first assembled ROCAT
The first assembled ROCAT
ROCAT proto-1 on a car roof
ROCAT proto-1 on a car roof
ROCAT proto-1 at sea
ROCAT proto-1 at sea
An animation of the ROCAT stroke
An animation of the ROCAT stroke
The first ROCAT prototype at sea
The first ROCAT prototype at sea
Search
all rights reserved © cristofa 2016
Powered by PhotoDeck
This website uses cookies. Learn more
Close